{"id":2822,"date":"2019-02-27T16:45:10","date_gmt":"2019-02-27T14:45:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/alegeliber.md\/?p=2822"},"modified":"2019-02-27T16:45:45","modified_gmt":"2019-02-27T14:45:45","slug":"raport-nr-5-de-monitorizare-a-mass-media-in-perioada-electorala-2019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/raport-nr-5-de-monitorizare-a-mass-media-in-perioada-electorala-2019-2822.html","title":{"rendered":"(Rom\u00e2n\u0103) RAPORT NR.5 DE MONITORIZARE A MASS MEDIA \u00ceN PERIOADA ELECTORAL\u0102 2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

This content is available only in Romanian<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

\"\"<\/a>Centrul pentru Jurnalism Independent (CJI) \u0219i Asocia\u021bia Presei Independente (API), \u00a0au prezentat miercuri, 27 februarie, rezultatele monitoriz\u0103rilor efectuate pe parcursul ultimei s\u0103pt\u0103m\u00e2ni de campanie electoral\u0103 (17-24 februarie). Cel de-al cincilea\u00a0raport<\/a>\u00a0de monitorizare a mass-media \u00een campania electoral\u0103 pentru alegerile parlamentare 2019, nu a atestat schimb\u0103ri esen\u021biale \u00een comportamentului presei, iar unele institu\u021bii media au continuat \u00een continuare s\u0103 favorizeze anumite partide.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Directoarea executiv\u0103 a CJI Nadine Gogu a men\u021bionat \u00een cadrul conferin\u021bei de pres\u0103 c\u0103 s-a a\u0219teptat la o schimbare a comportamentului radiodifuzorilor, \u00een special, dup\u0103 ce Consiliul Audiovizualului a aplicat primele sanc\u021biuni, \u00eens\u0103 acest lucru nu s-a \u00eent\u00e2mplat \u201eRaportul nostru arat\u0103 c\u0103 nu exist\u0103 nicio schimbare. A\u0219a cum au continuat unii radiodifuzori s\u0103 reflecte incorect campania electoral\u0103 \u2013 a\u0219a au f\u0103cut-o \u0219i dup\u0103 sanc\u021biuni\u201d, a subliniat Nadine Gogu.<\/p>\n

Potrivit directoarei executive a CJI, \u00een timp ce unii radiodifuzori au depus toate eforturile pentru a reflecta echilibrat campania electoral\u0103, cronometr\u00e2nd secund\u0103 cu secund\u0103, pentru a acorda timp egal tuturor candida\u021bilor, alte posturi au oferit acces preponderent concuren\u021bilor electorali afilia\u021bi anumitor partide.<\/p>\n

Nadine Gogu s-a referit \u0219i la lipsa de impact a sanc\u021biunilor aplicate de Consiliul Audiovizualului, care, de\u0219i face monitoriz\u0103ri \u0219i vine cu sanc\u021biuni, \u00a0lucrurile nu se schimb\u0103. \u201eAsta demonstreaz\u0103 o dat\u0103 \u00een plus c\u0103 avem un Consiliu al Audiovizualului, dar efect \u00een urma activit\u0103\u021bii acestui Consiliu nu avem, c\u00e2nd vorbim despre campanii electorale\u201d, a conchis Nadine Gogu.<\/p>\n

Directorul executiv al API, Petru Macovei, a ad\u0103ugat, la r\u00e2ndul s\u0103u, c\u0103 este cazul ca autoritatea de reglementare a audiovizualului s\u0103 aplice sanc\u021biuni mai eficiente. \u00cen opinia sa, institu\u021biile media care au reflectat corect campania electoral\u0103 au fost puse \u00een condi\u021bii egale cu cele care ai \u00eenc\u0103lcat legisla\u021bie, dar nu au suportat niciun fel de consecin\u021be, fapt care \u201enu este, sub nicio form\u0103, o atitudine corect\u0103 fa\u021b\u0103 de jurnali\u0219tii one\u0219ti\u201d.<\/p>\n

Raportul constat\u0103 c\u0103, domeniul audiovizual, sub aspectul pluralismului politic cea mai mare vizibilitate din punctul de vedere al frecven\u021bei \u0219i duratei apari\u021biilor \u00een imagini \u0219i al interven\u021biilor directe \u00een \u0219tiri, emisiuni \u0219i dezbateri au avut-o Partidul Democrat din Moldova (PDM), Partidul Sociali\u0219tilor din Moldova (PSRM) \u0219i Blocul electoral ACUM, urma\u021bi de Partidul politic \u0218or \u0219i Partidul Liberal (PL).<\/p>\n

Dintre candida\u021bii \u00eenscri\u0219i \u00een cursa electoral\u0103 \u00een circumscrip\u021biile uninominale, cei mai mediatiza\u021bi au fost Constantin \u021autu (afiliat PDM), Vladimir Plahotniuc (PDM), Andrei N\u0103stase (Blocul ACUM), Mihail Pop\u0219oi (Blocul ACUM) \u0219i Zinaida Grecean\u00e2i (PSRM).
\nDintre institu\u021biile de stat, pre\u0219edintele Dodon \u0219i reprezentan\u021bii Pre\u0219edin\u021biei de\u021bin \u00eent\u00e2ietatea at\u00e2t din punct de vedere al frecven\u021bei apari\u021biilor, c\u00e2t \u0219i al duratei interven\u021biilor directe.<\/p>\n

Portalurile online \u0219i ziarele monitorizate au apelat, \u00een total, la 3216 surse \u0219i protagoni\u0219ti din domeniul politic, inclusiv partide concurente \u00een circumscrip\u021bia electoral\u0103 na\u021bional\u0103, candida\u021bi \u00een circumscrip\u021biile uninominale sau reprezentan\u021bi de v\u00e2rf ai Pre\u0219edin\u021biei, Parlamentului \u0219i Guvernului.<\/p>\n

Dup\u0103 frecven\u021ba \u0219i durata apari\u021biilor (citate\/vorbire direct\u0103), cei mai vizibili concuren\u021bi electorali \u00een circumscrip\u021bia na\u021bional\u0103 au fost Partidul Democrat, urmat, la o anumit\u0103 distan\u021b\u0103, de Partidul Sociali\u0219tilor \u0219i Blocul electoral ACUM, apoi de Partidul politic \u0218or. PDM a beneficiat de cel mai mare spa\u021biu de mediatizare, dar \u0219i al vorbirii directe\/cit\u0103rii \u00een presa online. Dup\u0103 num\u0103rul de apari\u021bii, PDM a fost cel mai vizibil \u00een 13 din cele 16 institu\u021bii media monitorizate, PSRM \u00een 2, iar Blocul ACUM \u2013 la o institu\u021bie media.<\/p>\n

Reamintim c\u0103, pe domeniul audiovizual au fost monitorizate posturile TV Moldova 1, GRT, Prime TV, Canal 2, Canal 3, Publika TV, Jurnal TV, NTV Moldova, Pro TV Chi\u0219in\u0103u, TV8, Accent TV, TV Central\u0103. Domeniul online monitorizat a inclus portalurile Agora.md, Aif.md, Deschide.md, Diez.md, Esp.md, Gagauzinfo.md, Kp.md, Moldova.org, Newsmaker.md, Noi.md, Realitatea.md, Sputnik.md, Timpul.md, Unimedia.info, Zdg.md. Din presa scris\u0103 a fost monitorizat ziarul Jurnal de Chi\u0219in\u0103u.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This content is available only in Romanian<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n

Cel de-al cincilea\u00a0raport\u00a0de monitorizare a mass-media \u00een campania electoral\u0103 pentru alegerile parlamentare 2019, nu a atestat schimb\u0103ri esen\u021biale \u00een comportamentului presei, iar unele institu\u021bii media au continuat \u00een continuare s\u0103 favorizeze anumite partide.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":2824,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[62,3,67,1,30],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2822"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2822"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2822\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2826,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2822\/revisions\/2826"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}