{"id":740,"date":"2010-11-09T16:35:48","date_gmt":"2010-11-09T16:35:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/alegeliber.md\/?p=740"},"modified":"2010-11-21T18:31:03","modified_gmt":"2010-11-21T18:31:03","slug":"centrul-pentru-jurnalism-independent-a-lansat-al-treilea-raport-de-monitorizare-a-modului-in-care-este-reflectata-campania-electorala-pentru-alegerile-parlamentare-anticipate-de-catre-principalele-mas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/centrul-pentru-jurnalism-independent-a-lansat-al-treilea-raport-de-monitorizare-a-modului-in-care-este-reflectata-campania-electorala-pentru-alegerile-parlamentare-anticipate-de-catre-principalele-mas-740.html","title":{"rendered":"The Independent Journalism Center releases the results of the third phase of Media Monitoring of the Election Campaign for the Early Parliamentary Elections of November 28, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a rel=\"attachment wp-att-744\" href=\"http:\/\/alegeliber.md\/?attachment_id=744\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-744\" title=\"Raport CJI III\" src=\"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/Raport-CJI-III-200x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/Raport-CJI-III-200x150.jpg 200w, https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/Raport-CJI-III-100x75.jpg 100w, https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/Raport-CJI-III.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a>The  Independent Journalism Center, as part of the Civic Coalition for Free  and Fair Elections, releases the results of the third phase of  monitoring the manner in which the major media in Moldova have reflected  the campaign for the early parliamentary elections.        <strong> <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>General conclusions<\/strong><strong><em> <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Radio\/TV stations: <\/em><\/strong>Between  October 25 \u2013 October 31, 2010, the 10 monitored radio and TV stations  actively reflected the electoral campaign, broadcasting a total of 1,965  materials with direct or indirect electoral impact. The great majority  of the stations managed to provide pluralism of opinions in the  materials relevant to this monitoring.<\/p>\n<p>Thus,  public stations Moldova 1 and Radio Moldova continued to provide  access, in news and other programs, to several candidates, including  those representing extraparliamentary parties and independent  candidates. The Interim President and the Prime-Minister were quoted as  sources with markedly less frequency \u00a0in materials with indirect electoral impact. In most cases the relevant topics were presented neutrally, with \u00a0some electoral competitors appearing in either a positive or negative light.<\/p>\n<p>One  of the private stations with national coverage, Prime TV, mostly  reflected topics with direct electoral implication, providing access to  several competitors. This station\u2019s materials most often quoted the  representatives of the PCRM, mainly in a negative context. Of the  members of the Alliance for European Integration, the relevant materials  introduced representatives of the Our Moldova Alliance, the Liberal  Party and the Democratic Party, mainly in neutral and\/or positive  context.<\/p>\n<p>Another  private station, NIT, continued campaigning for the President of the  PCRM, demonstrating openly partisan behavior in favor of this candidate.  The PCRM dominated both news items and programs, and was \u00a0mainly  portrayed in a positive light. NIT failed to provide pluralism of  opinions, with extraparliamentary parties and independent candidates  having limited access to this TV station with national coverage.<\/p>\n<p>2  Plus, yet another station with national coverage, continued to  passively reflect the campaign, providing the public with only brief  information about the candidates and their electoral platforms. Thus,  this station did not fully accomplish its role of informing the public  about various candidates. N4, a station with regional coverage, more  actively reflected electoral topics in its news programs. N4 provided a  relative pluralism of opinions, offering access to several electoral  competitors, including independent candidates.<\/p>\n<p>News  stations Publika TV and Jurnal TV continued to actively reflect events  with electoral implications during the monitored period, broadcasting  various news items that presented a large number of electoral  competitors, as well as many opinion programs that discussed the topic  of elections. During the monitored period these two stations did not  show any evident tendency towards favoring any of the competitors.  Judging by the frequency of positive and negative portrayals of  competitors, Jurnal TV and Publika TV slightly disapprove of the PCRM.<\/p>\n<p>Vocea  Basarabiei, a private radio station, actively reflected issues with  direct and indirect electoral character, especially in news, opinion and  special electoral programs, while Prime FM limited itself mostly to  news programs. Both stations showed disapproval of the PCRM, and Vocea  Basarabiei favored the Liberal Party, the Liberal Democratic Party and  the Our Moldova Alliance.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>3.2 Print Media\/News Agencies\/Web Portals: <\/em><\/strong>Newspapers  reflected the electoral campaign more in opinion articles than in news  items, which denotes a tendency towards filling the publication with  opinions about candidates and comments regarding their actions, and not  with objectively presented facts and events. The amount of electoral  advertizing in newspapers increased, while the number of articles on  electoral education still remains low.<\/p>\n<p>During  the monitored period, the division of media outlets according to the  electoral preferences of editors and journalists continued. Thus,  several outlets (<em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.omg.md\/\">www.omg.md<\/a><\/em>, newspapers <em>Nezavisimaia Moldova<\/em>, <em>Moldova Suveran\u0103<\/em>)  had a biased editorial approach, on the one hand aimed at promoting the  PCRM, and on the other hand \u2013 at denigrating the political opponents of  the PCRM. In some cases, the materials selected for publication by  these media outlets were \u00a0speculative; they distorted the facts and did not provide the right to reply.<\/p>\n<p>Newspapers <em>Timpul<\/em> <em>de diminea\u0163\u0103 <\/em>and<em> Jurnal de Chi\u015fin\u0103u<\/em> either criticized the PCRM or presented it in a primarily negative  context. Non-communist electoral competitors, especially the Liberal  Democratic Party and the Liberal Party, were favored particularly in  opinion articles. The information portal <a href=\"http:\/\/www.unimedia.md\/\"><em>www.unimedia.md<\/em><\/a> disapproved of the PCRM and presented non-communist parties, especially those liberally oriented, in mainly a positive context.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>Flux<\/em> newspaper criticized all electoral competitors except the Christian  Democratic People\u2019s Party, which was favored both in news items and  opinion articles. Newspapers <em>Evenimentul Zilei <\/em>and <em>Panorama<\/em>, also had a mainly critical \u00a0editorial approach towards most of the electoral competitors. Both publications mainly disapproved of the PCRM, while <em>Evenimentul Zilei<\/em> also disapproved of the LP and the LDPM, with no tendencies towards favoring any other candidate.<\/p>\n<p>Local independent newspapers, <em>Cuv\u00e2ntul<\/em> and <em>Gazeta de Sud<\/em>,  published mostly neutral news items, while their opinion articles  presented the PCRM more negatively than positively, denoting slight  tendencies towards favoring the LDPM. Local public newspapers, <em>Vesti Gagauzii<\/em> and <em>Golos B\u0103l\u0163i<\/em> seemed to have withdrawn themselves \u00a0from  reflecting the electoral campaign, and publishing no articles on this  issue during the reported week, except for advertizing from electoral  competitors. <em>Komsomolskaia pravda v Moldove<\/em> was also less  involved in reflecting the campaign, providing readers with brief  information in exchange for large amounts of electoral advertizing. The  few opinion articles published by this newspaper denoted a slight  tendency towards favoring the PCRM.<\/p>\n<p>The <em>Moldpres<\/em> news agency favored the ruling alliance, while the <em>Infotag<\/em> agency maintained a relative impartiality regarding the Alliance for  European Integration, presenting electoral competitors both in a  positive and negative light, but placing PCRM in a predominantly  disadvantaged context.<em> <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The  project \u201cMonitoring mass media during the electoral campaign\u201d is  implemented in partnership with the Independent Press Association and  the Institute for Marketing and Polls IMAS-INC Chisinau. The monitoring  period is September 28 to November 28, 2010. The results will be  published in bimonthly reports, in the first month of the monitoring,  then in weekly reports.<\/em><em> <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>The  project is funded by the Embassy of the United Kingdom of Great Britain  and Northern Ireland to Moldova, by the Council of Europe and by the  East-European Foundation, with funds provided by the Swedish  International Development and Cooperation Agency (SIDA), Ministry of  Foreign Affairs of Denmark, National Endowment for Democracy (NED), U.S.  Agency for International Development (USAID) through the Eurasia  Foundation. Also, this report is made possible with the generous support  of the American people, \u00a0through the United States Agency  for International Development (USAID) under AED`s Moldova Civil Society  Strengthening Program (MCSSP).<\/em> The views expressed are \u00a0the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of donors.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Independent Journalism Center, as part of the Civic Coalition for Free and Fair Elections, releases the results of the third phase of monitoring the manner in which the major media in Moldova have reflected the campaign for the early parliamentary elections. General conclusions Radio\/TV stations: Between October 25 \u2013 October 31, 2010, the 10 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4,3,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/740"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=740"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/740\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=740"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=740"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alegeliber.md\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=740"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}